Grade 20
Corresponding Standard GB /T 17107-1997
Structural Steel Grades And Mechanical Property For Forgings
Classification Carbon Steel
20 Chemical Element Composition Content (%)
Component C Si Mn P S Cr Ni Cu
Minimum Value 0.17 0.17 0.35 - - - - -
Maximum Value 0.24 0.37 0.65 0.035 0.035 0.25 0.25 0.25
• High-quality steel——P≤0.035;S≤0.035;Cu≤0.3;Cr≤0.3;Ni≤0.3
• Extra-quality steel (Suffix A)——P≤0.025;S≤0.025;Cu≤0.25;Cr≤0.3;Ni≤0.3
• Special High-Quality Steel (Suffix E)——P≤0.025;S≤0.015;Cu≤0.25;Cr≤0.3;Ni≤0.3
• Cu is not more than 0.3% when smelting scrap steel
20 Mechanical Properties
diameter or thickness
d
mm
Mark
Heat Treatment or Condition
Tensile Strength
σb
Mpa
Yield Point
σs
Mpa
Elongation or Extension Rate
δ
%
Reduction of Area
ψ
%
Hardness
HBW
Impact Energy Absorption
KV2
J
d≤100 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing or normalizing + tempering ≥340 ≥215 ≥24 ≥50 103~156 ≥43
100<d≤250 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing or normalizing + tempering ≥330 ≥195 ≥23 ≥45 103~156 ≥39
250<d≤500 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing or normalizing + tempering ≥320 ≥185 ≥22 ≥40 103~156 ≥39
500<d≤1000 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing or normalizing + tempering ≥300 ≥175 ≥20 ≥35 103~156 ≥35
• The forgings must be inspected for mechanical properties after performance heat treatment and before any surface treatment.
• After the samples are removed, no heat treatments that affect the mechanical properties or any processing that influences the test results shall be conducted.
• Mechanical property testing primarily evaluates the material\'s tensile strength, impact resistance, and hardness. When conducting tensile, impact, and hardness tests simultaneously, the hardness value is for reference only. Alternatively, one may choose to perform only one of the tensile, impact, or hardness tests.
1 Approximate Comparison Table
China Taiwan, China Japan South Korea United States Germany France Russia Sweden United Kingdom
GB ISC CNS JIS KS ASTM/AISI UNS DIN EN/DIN W-Nr. NF EN/NF GOST SS BS EN/BS
20 U20202 S20C S20C SM20C 1020 G10200 C22E
Ck22
1.1151 C22E
XC18
20 1435 C22E
070M20
2 Approximate Comparison Table
International Organization for Standardization Germany France European Standard
ISO DIN EN/DIN NF EN/NF EN Numerical Grade
C25R Cm22 XC18u C22R
C22R
1.1149
3 Approximate Comparison Table
China European Standard
GB EN Numerical Grade
20 P235TR1 1.0254
4 Approximate Comparison Table
China Japan United States International Organization for Standardization Germany France European Standard Russia Sweden United Kingdom
GB JIS ASTM ISO DIN EN/DIN W-Nr. NF EN/NF EN Numerical Grade GOST SS BS EN/BS
20 SB410
SGV410
SPV235
SPV24
A285
A285Gr.C
P3 ASt35
HI
StE255
1.0345 A37AP
A37CP
P235GH 1.0345 12k 1330
1330-01
141-360
161Gr.360
5 Approximate Comparison Table
China Japan United States International Organization for Standardization Germany European Standard Russia Sweden United Kingdom
GB JIS SAE ISO DIN EN/DIN W-Nr. EN Numerical Grade GOST SS BS EN/BS
20 S20C
S22C
1020 C25 C22 1.0402 C22 1.0402 20 1450 070M20
6 Approximate Comparison Table
China Japan United States International Organization for Standardization Germany France European Standard Russia Sweden United Kingdom
GB JIS ASTM ISO DIN EN/DIN NF EN/NF EN Numerical Grade GOST SS BS EN/BS
20 SM490B A537CL1 E355 StE355 A510AP
E355R
P355N 1.0562 15GF 2106 223Gr.490
50DD
7 Approximate Comparison Table
China Japan United States France Russia United Kingdom
GB JIS ASTM/AISI NF EN/NF GOST BS EN/BS
20 S20C 1020 C20
XC18
20 040A20
050A20
060A20

Note: The data is for reference only! If you have any questions, please fill out "I want to correct it"!