Grade 40
Corresponding Standard GB /T 17107-1997
Structural Steel Grades And Mechanical Property For Forgings
Classification Carbon Steel
40 Chemical Element Composition Content (%)
Component C Si Mn P S Cr Ni Cu
Minimum Value 0.37 0.17 0.5 - - - - -
Maximum Value 0.45 0.37 0.8 0.035 0.035 0.25 0.25 0.25
• High-quality steel——P≤0.035;S≤0.035;Cu≤0.3;Cr≤0.3;Ni≤0.3
• Extra-quality steel (Suffix A)——P≤0.025;S≤0.025;Cu≤0.25;Cr≤0.3;Ni≤0.3
• Special High-Quality Steel (Suffix E)——P≤0.025;S≤0.015;Cu≤0.25;Cr≤0.3;Ni≤0.3
• Cu is not more than 0.3% when smelting scrap steel
40 Mechanical Properties
diameter or thickness
d
mm
Mark
Heat Treatment or Condition
Tensile Strength
σb
Mpa
Yield Point
σs
Mpa
Elongation or Extension Rate
δ
%
Reduction of Area
ψ
%
Hardness
HBW
Impact Energy Absorption
KV2
J
d≤100 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing + tempering ≥550 ≥275 ≥17 ≥40 143~207 ≥24
100<d≤250 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing + tempering ≥530 ≥265 ≥17 ≥36 143~207 ≥24
250<d≤500 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing + tempering ≥510 ≥255 ≥16 ≥32 143~207 ≥20
500<d≤1000 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing + tempering ≥490 ≥245 ≥15 ≥30 143~207 ≥20
d≤100 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Tempering ≥615 ≥340 ≥18 ≥40 196~241 ≥39
100<d≤250 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Tempering ≥590 ≥295 ≥17 ≥35 189~229 ≥31
250<d≤500 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Tempering ≥560 ≥275 ≥17 - 163~219 -
• The forgings must be inspected for mechanical properties after performance heat treatment and before any surface treatment.
• After the samples are removed, no heat treatments that affect the mechanical properties or any processing that influences the test results shall be conducted.
• Mechanical property testing primarily evaluates the material\'s tensile strength, impact resistance, and hardness. When conducting tensile, impact, and hardness tests simultaneously, the hardness value is for reference only. Alternatively, one may choose to perform only one of the tensile, impact, or hardness tests.
1 Approximate Comparison Table
China Taiwan, China Japan South Korea United States International Organization for Standardization Germany France Russia United Kingdom
GB ISC CNS JIS KS ASTM/AISI UNS ISO DIN EN/DIN W-Nr. NF EN/NF GOST BS EN/BS
40 U20402 S40C S40C SM40C 1040 G10400 C40E4 C40E
Ck40
1.1186 C40E
XC42
40 C40E
080M40
2 Approximate Comparison Table
China Japan International Organization for Standardization European Standard
GB JIS ISO EN Numerical Grade
40 S40C C40 C40 1.0511
3 Approximate Comparison Table
China Japan International Organization for Standardization European Standard
GB JIS ISO EN Numerical Grade
40 S40C C40E C40E 1.1186
4 Approximate Comparison Table
China Japan United States International Organization for Standardization Germany France European Standard Russia United Kingdom
GB JIS ASTM ISO DIN EN/DIN W-Nr. NF EN/NF EN Numerical Grade GOST BS EN/BS
40 S40C 1038
1040
C40
C40E4
C40
Ck40
1.0511 AF60C40
AF60C45
XC42HI
C40 1.0511 40 070M40
080M40
En8
5 Approximate Comparison Table
China Japan United States International Organization for Standardization France Russia United Kingdom
GB JIS ASTM/AISI ISO NF EN/NF GOST BS EN/BS
GB/T 699-1999
40
S40C 1040 ISO 630-1:1987
C40
C40E4
C40M2
C42
XC42
40 060A40
6 Approximate Comparison Table
China United Kingdom
GB BS EN/BS
40 080A42

Note: The data is for reference only! If you have any questions, please fill out "I want to correct it"!