Grade 50
Corresponding Standard GB /T 17107-1997
Structural Steel Grades And Mechanical Property For Forgings
Classification Carbon Steel
50 Chemical Element Composition Content (%)
Component C Si Mn P S Cr Ni Cu
Minimum Value 0.47 0.17 0.5 - - - - -
Maximum Value 0.55 0.37 0.8 0.035 0.035 0.25 0.25 0.25
• High-quality steel——P≤0.035;S≤0.035;Cu≤0.3;Cr≤0.3;Ni≤0.3
• Extra-quality steel (Suffix A)——P≤0.025;S≤0.025;Cu≤0.25;Cr≤0.3;Ni≤0.3
• Special High-Quality Steel (Suffix E)——P≤0.025;S≤0.015;Cu≤0.25;Cr≤0.3;Ni≤0.3
• Cu is not more than 0.3% when smelting scrap steel
50 Mechanical Properties
diameter or thickness
d
mm
Mark
Heat Treatment or Condition
Tensile Strength
σb
Mpa
Yield Point
σs
Mpa
Elongation or Extension Rate
δ
%
Reduction of Area
ψ
%
Hardness
HBW
Impact Energy Absorption
KV2
J
d≤100 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing + tempering ≥610 ≥310 ≥13 ≥35 - ≥23
100<d≤300 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing + tempering ≥590 ≥295 ≥12 ≥33 - ≥19
300<d≤500 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing + tempering ≥570 ≥285 ≥12 ≥30 - ≥19
500<d≤750 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Normalizing + tempering ≥550 ≥265 ≥12 ≥28 - ≥15
d≤16 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Tempering ≥700 ≥500 ≥14 ≥30 - ≥31
16<d≤40 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Tempering ≥650 ≥430 ≥16 ≥35 - ≥31
40<d≤100 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Tempering ≥630 ≥370 ≥17 ≥40 - ≥31
100<d≤250 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Tempering ≥590 ≥345 ≥17 ≥35 - ≥31
250<d≤500 Sample Direction: Longitudinal Tempering ≥590 ≥345 ≥17 - - -
• The forgings must be inspected for mechanical properties after performance heat treatment and before any surface treatment.
• After the samples are removed, no heat treatments that affect the mechanical properties or any processing that influences the test results shall be conducted.
• Mechanical property testing primarily evaluates the material\'s tensile strength, impact resistance, and hardness. When conducting tensile, impact, and hardness tests simultaneously, the hardness value is for reference only. Alternatively, one may choose to perform only one of the tensile, impact, or hardness tests.
1 Approximate Comparison Table High-Quality Carbon Structural Steel
China Taiwan, China Japan South Korea United States International Organization for Standardization Germany France Russia Sweden United Kingdom
GB ISC CNS JIS KS ASTM/AISI UNS ISO DIN EN/DIN W-Nr. NF EN/NF GOST SS BS EN/BS
50 U20502 S50C S50C SM50C 1050 G10500 C50E4 C50E
Ck53
1.1210 C50E 50 1674 C50E
080M50
2 Approximate Comparison Table Carbon Structural Steel and Engineering Steel
China Japan International Organization for Standardization
GB JIS ISO
50 S50C C50
3 Approximate Comparison Table Non-Alloy Steel for Quenching and Tempering
China Japan International Organization for Standardization European Standard
GB JIS ISO EN Numerical Grade
50 S50C C50E C50E 1.1206
4 Approximate Comparison Table High-Quality Carbon Structural Steel
China Japan United States International Organization for Standardization Germany France European Standard Russia Sweden United Kingdom
GB JIS ASTM ISO DIN EN/DIN NF EN/NF EN Numerical Grade GOST SS BS EN/BS
50 S50C 1049
1050
C50
C50E4
C50
Ck50
XC48H1 C50 1.0540 50 1674 070M50
080M50
5 Approximate Comparison Table High-Quality Carbon Structural Steel
China Japan United States International Organization for Standardization France Russia United Kingdom
GB JIS ASTM/AISI ISO NF EN/NF GOST BS EN/BS
GB/T 699-1999
50
S50C 1049
1050
ISO 630-1:1987
C50
C50E4
C50M2
C50
XC48
50 060A52

Note: The data is for reference only! If you have any questions, please fill out "I want to correct it"!